BHPC Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Public: Open to anyone > Racing > Etc
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - A question about BHPC race formats
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Starting a new topic? Please try and put it in a relevant forum (Riding, Building, etc) but if you're not sure it's better to post in any forum than not to post at all.


Topic ClosedA question about BHPC race formats

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Message
25hz View Drop Down
Visitor (occasional)
Visitor (occasional)
Avatar

Joined: 02 November 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 99
Direct Link To This Post Topic: A question about BHPC race formats
    Posted: 23 June 2009 at 2:48pm
In going back through the newsletters, I noticed that the majority of races that the BHPC holds are of the endurance format, as opposed to shorter sprints.  I was wondering why the BHPC doesn't also hold shorter format races like 200m and 1km as maybe a prelude to the longer lap races?  The riders aren't interested in the sprints?  Time constraints?  Just curious :)
Back to Top
Andrew S View Drop Down
Admin Group
Admin Group
Avatar

Joined: 14 March 2005
Location: Hornsea, UK
Status: Offline
Points: 2433
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2009 at 3:29pm
The reasons are mostly practical:
  • 200m sprints pretty much require electronic timing, which we don't have (at least not as yet in a totally reliable form). 1km sprints can just about be done with manual timing and were included in the programme at Reading this year.

  • Until this year the software we use for results wasn't able to combine more than one race (eg a sprint and a criterium) per event. That is now possible and so this year several of the events have multiple 'rounds' as we call them.
So, while you won't have seen this in previous years you will probably see it more and more from now on.
Back to Top
Adrian Setter View Drop Down
BHPC Member
BHPC Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 March 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 June 2009 at 3:41pm
Originally posted by Andrew S Andrew S wrote:

So, while you won't have seen this in previous years you will probably see it more and more from now on.
 
Indeed.  Already this season, POINTS races have included a 1k at Reading and, at Fowlmead (yet to be posted, but coming soon) a short (about 4km) time trial.  Thanks again to Kevin for updating the race software to make this possible.
 
The longer races are likely to continue to be the core of most meetings: not many of us want to travel hundreds of miles just for a 13-second sprint.
Challenge Hurricane - MicWic Delta (Front half) - Burrows Ratracer
Back to Top
25hz View Drop Down
Visitor (occasional)
Visitor (occasional)
Avatar

Joined: 02 November 2006
Location: Canada
Status: Offline
Points: 99
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2009 at 12:40pm
Cool, thanks.  Multi-round events, I think, definitely make it more worthwhile to spend the time and money to attend.  One of the things that makes the HPRA races worth the large distances travelled to get to them is the fact that there are at least 6 different races per day that I can particpate in.  For the last event, my total mileage for the two days of racing was a little over 150km at race speeds.  By the end of the 2nd day, there was nothing left in my legs.  It was great.  Add to that the bonus that there are small cash purses for each race, and so far, with the appropriate sacrifices to the racing gods, I've managed to decently subsidize the travel costs with winnings.
 
Do you guys also track course records for the various events and classes too?
Back to Top
Paul Lowing View Drop Down
Visitor (regular)
Visitor (regular)
Avatar

Joined: 23 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2009 at 1:08pm
Don't start the cash prize discussion!  Shocked Big smile
Back to Top
Adrian Setter View Drop Down
BHPC Member
BHPC Member
Avatar

Joined: 04 March 2005
Status: Offline
Points: 1606
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2009 at 1:59pm
Then again, if we had cash prizes, maybe that would supplement Mr Burrows' pension enough for him to retire properly, close his workshop and stop churning out the go-faster technology with which he can beat those of us who are merely middle-aged.  Wink
Challenge Hurricane - MicWic Delta (Front half) - Burrows Ratracer
Back to Top
Paul Lowing View Drop Down
Visitor (regular)
Visitor (regular)
Avatar

Joined: 23 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1264
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2009 at 2:10pm
He might retire properly and then spend ALL his time on churning out go-faster technology...
Back to Top
JDub View Drop Down
BHPC Member
BHPC Member


Joined: 01 November 2005
Location: Egham
Status: Offline
Points: 480
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 June 2009 at 5:24pm
In cycling terms, ours are not endurance events! The 4 hour race at the Worlds is closer to it. No prize money please! We have enough trouble working out who won what, without deciding who deserves what.   
jdub... Got the T-shirt
http://protobikes.org.uk/
https://www.flickr.com/photos/150386999@N02/
Back to Top
legs_larry View Drop Down
BHPC Member
BHPC Member
Avatar

Joined: 09 March 2005
Location: London Town Devine
Status: Offline
Points: 1554
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 June 2009 at 11:42am
Originally posted by Andrew S Andrew S wrote:


  • Until this year the software we use for results wasn't able to combine more than one race (eg a sprint and a criterium) per event. That is now possible and so this year several of the events have multiple 'rounds' as we call them.
Objection, yeronner!  See Darley Moor 2002, results calculated using SCIENCE I welded up myself, albeit based on characters created by the NVHPV some time in the last century..
====================

a bit ov a lyv wyr by slof standirds
Back to Top
KevinJ View Drop Down
Committee
Committee
Avatar

Joined: 04 March 2005
Location: United Kingdom
Status: Offline
Points: 1079
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26 June 2009 at 12:31pm
Originally posted by Legs_Larry Legs_Larry wrote:

Originally posted by Andrew S


  • Until this year the software we use for results wasn't able to combine more than one race (eg a sprint and a criterium) per event. That is now possible and so this year several of the events have multiple 'rounds' as we call them.
Objection, yeronner!  See Darley Moor 2002, results calculated using SCIENCE I welded up myself, albeit based on characters created by the NVHPV some time in the last century..
Ok .... My software was useless enough to be able to merge multiple rounds... until this year.  Is that more correct? Wink It is difficult makeing this softeare easy enough to use for general use, when in fact they are doing something which is quite complex.
Kevin Jenkins

Windcheetah
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.07
Copyright ©2001-2024 Web Wiz Ltd.